LaserTec C130 Notes

I was pulling apart an old LaserTec C140 confocal microscope. Here are some pics! Here’s the main optical block:

There’s a photodiode, I assume with a pinhole and CCD sensor here:

On the other side of the unit there’s an FPGA.

Under the unit there’s a stepper (right) and a BL55 “Laserscale”.

I’ve been trying to figure out how all this fits together. The unit appears to be white light only, but I’m unclear on where the actuation is. It looks like everything is on the bottom of the unit. I guess the BL55 laser scale is used in combination with that stepper. But I’m not clear if there’s a full sub-micron precision XYZ stage here or if there’s something else going on. I was really expecting to see Galvos to scan the spot across the sample… hmmm.

Arducam Pivistation 5 Klarity I2C

I was trying to interface directly with the I2C on the Arducam Pivistation 5 Klarity camera module for… reasons.

Anyway I figured this would just expose the I2C on the IMX283… but it doesn’t seem to. There seems in fact to be another little microcontroller (GD e230f8?) there which uses a different I2C command set. It seems similar to the interface from this camera:

https://github.com/ArduCAM/Arducam-Pivariety-V4L2-Driver/blob/7d49aa22558254cd415ef5bbca458a39ad130dce/patchs/arducam_driver.patch#L38

Anyway… I was able to get some info out of it using a Glasgow Interface Explorer. This note is here so someone else doesn’t waste time wondering why the IMX283 (which I think should respond on 0x1a) is responding on 0x0c on this camera.

The Glasgow commands required are below:

Also, it seems that you can crash the microcontroller pretty easily by doing additional reads?

Pacific Biosciences Accuracy Notes

DateOverallInsertionsDeletionsSubstitutionsRead LengthRef
PacBio RS II~2013~11%“predominantly indel”“predominantly indel”“predominantly indel”Vendor
PacBio RS II2020~13%8%3%1.68%Academic Benchmark
PacBio RS II CLR202012.88%8.04%3.16%1.68%8899Academic Benchmark
PacBio RS II Subread201714.2%5.92%3.01%5.27%Academic Benchmark
PacBio Sequel I CLR201912%Inferred from Vendor Claim
PacBio Sequel II CLR201910%~50KbInferred from Vendor Claim
Revio (Subread)202310%All: 100Kb+?Inferred from Vendor Claim
PacBio RS II CCS20171.720.087%0.34%1.3%1772Academic Benchmark
PacBio Sequel HiFi20220.25%0.1%0.13%0.02%Academic Note
PacBio Sequel II CCS20190.14%Academic Benchmark
PacBio Sequel  II HiFi2019<0.1%20KbVendor Claim
Revio (All HiFi)2023<0.1%16.5KbVendor Claim

Random Notes 5

Xaar 128

https://github.com/MatthiasWM/Xaar128

https://github.com/gkyle/xaar128

https://www.xaar.com/en/products/xaar-printheads/xaar-128/

http://ytec3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=47

chinese inkjet info: http://m.6lon.com/sdm/132165/2/cp-1003311/0.html

RNA Bioanalyzer

PaperQuantification pg/ul RNARunPlots
Urine RNA Processing in a Clinical Setting: Comparison of Three Protocols397.5 ng/60 mL (Qubit RNA HS)Agilent 4200 TapeStationRIN: 5.9An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is nihms918280f3b.jpg
Urine RNA Processing in a Clinical Setting: Comparison of Three Protocols397.5 ng/60 mL(Qubit RNA HS)Agilent 4200 TapeStationRIN: 3.3An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is nihms918280f3a.jpg
Deep Sequencing of Urinary RNAs for Bladder Cancer Molecular Diagnostics0.98 ng/mL0.08 ng/mLProcessed within two hours of collectionAgilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, RNA Pico chipsRIN ranged from 2.5 to 9.5Mean: 6.03No plots
Identification of microRNAs in blood and urine as tumour markers for the detection of urinary bladder cancer~2 ng/uL (fig. 1)Several urine RNA isolates showed low RIN values <3No plots
Urinary MicroRNA-Based Diagnostic Model for Central Nervous System Tumors Using Nanowire ScaffoldsQubit microRNA AssayAgilent 2100 BioanalyzerRIN: 81638356162683-129.png

RNA Papers

SingleMol Imaging

Solid state Nanopore

Hitachi, making pores with dialectric breakdown, slowing, notes on viscosity to slow etc: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep31324.pdf

Keio University group, optical observation of translocation: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.7567/APEX.9.017001/pdf


Amplification/Electronics

ASIC Design, to go to 1MHz: https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.1932

Noise measurements from above:

Instrumentation for Low-Noise High-Bandwidth Nanopore Recording. Engineered Nanopores for Bioanalytical Applications: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781437734737000030

Above has lots of nice protocol information.

Ionic Speed/Current

“If we recall that an Ampere corresponds to a charge flow of 1 Coulomb each second and further, use the fact that the charge on a monovalent ion is approximately 1.6 x 10-19 Coulombs (that is 1 electron or 1 proton charge), then we see that a current of about one pA corresponds to roughly 107 ions passing through the channel each second. This value is in agreement with measurements” http://book.bionumbers.org/how-many-ions-pass-through-an-ion-channel-per-second/

Molecular Dynamics of Ionic Current: https://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/silica/IonRect.html

DNA Speed:
From, measures time to translocate two adjacent pores. distance is ~1.5um: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/nl2030079

Folded/Knotted DNA:

Detection of knotted DNA

https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2016.153

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12358-4

Folding

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20608744

Double stranded Lambda DNA (16um long, 48kb). Translocates in 3 different confirmations. Grabbed at the end. Grabbed in the middle (completely folded), Grabbed near an edge (partly folded). Difference in current levels is ~1nS between each confirmation (200pA). 22nm pore is used. Translocation time ~3ms.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04715

Hairpins, P2000 pulled quartz nano-pipette. Using hairpins to encode DNA 8bp and 16bp hairpins.

DNA Folds for data storage by Ulrich: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30585490